A Critique of the GPI Ranking System

The Global Poker Index, or GPI, is a leaderboard system that ranks the top live tournament poker players in the world according to their performance. CEO Alexander Dreyfus has stated that his goal with GPI is to define who the star players are in order to increase exposure, creative compelling narratives, and grow the industry as a whole. To this end, his efforts have already paid dividends. The rankings have not only been readily accepted in the culture and the poker media, but also in major mainstream outlets such as USA Today. However, the system as it stands today has flaws that threaten to undermine its credibility as comprehensive measure of tournament poker skill.

Recently, GPI has started to draw some criticism from players who say that the way it scores performance doesn't make sense. As a tournament player myself, I've shared this attitude, and I've done a bit of analysis on the issue.

More Chess! A Cool Endgame

Take a look at this chess game I recently played. By this point in the endgame, I (white) am down two pawns worth of material, and my only major piece is a knight versus my opponent's bishop:

A Chess Challenge In the State Library of Victoria

While exploring Melbourne central, I came upon the State Library of Victoria, from where I'm writing this post now. It's a spectacular building– by far the largest and busiest library I've ever been in. This, for example, is just one of its many, many rooms:

The area I found the most interesting, though, is the chess room: a section of the building filled with chess literature and chess players of all skill levels:

10 Differences In Poker In Australia

Poker is played a little different everywhere you go, so it's neat when you can spot some differences. Here's 10 that I've noticed since arriving in Melbourne for WSOP Asia Pacific.

(Note: may not work on mobile)